infant studies|Is male infant circumcision an appropriate gender studies question?
About infant studies,news book blog: and Newborn Baby Clothes.
The following are not relevant to the content of some infant studies,but classicFriendship is like earthenware: once broken, it can be mended; love is like a mirror: once broken, that ends it. (Josh Billings. American humorist)A friend is never known till a man has need. Your mind is like this water, my friend, when it is agitated, it becomes difficult to see, but if you allow it to settle, the answer becomes clear..the world puts off its mask of vastness to its lover.it becomes small as one song, as one kiss of the eternal.。！！Health tips :The baby couture might be better replaced with convenient one-piece suits in practical white terry cloth.
infant studies–: Is male infant circumcision an appropriate gender studies question?
I believe it is. I think it should be broached with sensitivity, because it is a subject that can make parents who have allowed it to be done to feel guilt, grief and pain, but it should still be discussed. Male infant circumcision is injurious to the infant psychologically and physically, and to the mother infant bond, as well as lifelong sexuality.
The answer in the following: (Hint: The correct answer provided by the users, does not guarantee the right.)
Answer by jabberwocky
I think it is a great topic. There are still many myths about circumcision and why it would be necessary, which it isn’t. It is an out of date procedure, in my opinion. And you will come to find out, that the rest of the world doesn’t normally perform circumcision as commonly as we do in the US.
Answer by The Doc Love
I don’t see why not, it is gender based!
Answer by Mushtaq A
Yes. it is . I believe. But it is necessary to eliminate other ailments regarding allergy and other pains, Infant circumcision is to alleviate other life long sex problems.
Answer by Nigz
AHHHH they still do that? freakkkkkkkks
wash your damn foreskin
Answer by Villa
I agree with you completely.
Answer by MZT
I too believed it was unnecessary until two nephews in our family had to have the procedure done at 10 and 12 years old, after each having a series of repeated infections…quite surprising really and now I am not so sure…in both cases the parents were firmly opposed to circumcision…but getting young boys to clean under their foreskin is quite difficult, and on a microscopic level the area continually fills with germs.
Answer by putt putt…
is injurious to the infant??
What about a man?
It should encourage the parents to question the doctors reasons and what they were told and what is being done with what has been removed that will affect them the rest of their life. (example, foreskins being used for anti aging creme)
Did they tell the parents before removing part of their infants private:
1. When your baby reaches puberty, his “manly part” size will be SMALLER.
2.The skin may feel it is stretching during an arousal.
3. We will be removing the majority of your babies sensitive nerve endings and will reduce the feeling of his sexual pleasure..
4.Your baby may grow into a self conscious male when he learns what we did to his manly part to be used as an experiment and aging creme.
4.Your baby may grow into a man with the urge to drink alcohol to increase the sexual feeling that was damaged by removing part of his private and possibly lead to alcoholism…
5. Your baby will grow to understand his manly part was “cut up” and will hear “small pen-s jokes” by others and knowing his could not be what is was meant to be because we removed a part that allowed for expansion resulting in a smaller size.
I see this as criminal activity protected by the
“CRIMINAL Justice System” and decorating it with too many kind words may have people believe
“not a big deal”.
The more people know, the more people can question and force doctors to explain their actions.
Its time for the “veil” to be lifted.
Answer by ʄaçade
Gender-based child abuse in all its forms is an appropriate topic here.
Answer by Judy & Charlie
I’ve read your opinion on male circumcision of infants is injurious to the infant psychologically and physically and is injurious to the mother infant bond and lifelong sexuality….what crap!
Men who are not circumcised are dirty. They can infect a female partner more easily with sexually transmitted diseases and will contribute to cervical cancer in their partners. Also, men have to undergo operations later in life when infections set in under their foreskins due to the buildup of smegma.
Because the central nervous system isn’t totally formed yet at birth, the procedure produces very little pain and is more healthy for the male in the long run. Who wouldn’t want their sons circumcised if it could help him overcome disease and infection?
Answer by Connor
I agree with you 100% Even about the pain and guilt thing.
My parents betrayed me by circumcising me without my permission and causing me a lifetime of damage. As a result it’s caused me a lifestime of emotional pain. The very least that can happen is parents feel horrible about doing it forever.
-Connor
Add your own answer in the comments!
infant studies
The following are not relevant to the content of some infant studies,but classicLove the neighbor. But don‘t get caughtAn ounce of luck is better than a pound of wisdom. One meets its destiny on the road he takes to avoid it..Every man is the architect of his own fortune.。！！Reminded :Improve your indoor air quality and maintain a healthy household environment
infant studies–: Alfred Kinsey and his studies on infants?
Was talking to a female here about this (dare I say) man and the way he had little infant male babies sexually stimulated to see if there was some truth to the “born gay” theory.
Is it just me or should this be a crime? I don’t see how slapping “scientific research” on molestation could ever make it justified.
The following is the answer: (Hint: For answers, no site audit.)
Answer by bluenaketat
That sounds like molestation to me! How can that be scientific? That is sick! I got freaked out when my daughter “discovered” herself and would giggle when i wiped her when i change her diaper!
Answer by sosagely
I don’t know all the details, but from the way you put it, it sounds wrong. I would say any adult trying to sexually stimulate a child is not acceptable.
Answer by MommyMandy
Thats sick! He should rot in jail for that! I dont know why any mother or father would put their innocent baby through that!
Answer by Evie’s mummy =]
That has made me feel physically sick. Definitely a crime.
Answer by goingcrazypart3
“In 1981 questions were raised of how Kinsey and his staff gathered the information to produce some of the data in the Kinsey Reports. Attention was directed to Tables 30-34 of Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, which report observations of orgasms in over three-hundred children between the ages of five months and fourteen years.[7] Former and current directors of The Kinsey Institute confirmed that some of the information was gathered from nine pedophiles and that Kinsey chose not to report the pedophiles to the authorities, balancing what Kinsey saw as the need for their anonymity against the likelihood that their crimes would continue.[8][9]”
This in no way excuses anything but he didn’t actually himself. And yes it is very wrong and having children myself including a boy and being molested as a child, makes me want to scream at a**holes like him who endangered other children for his research. But this is the truth of it.
Answer by your_feet_smell_like_cheese
wow that’s disturbing, but what kind of parents would allow this? If a child is gay there’s nothing you can do about it but to accept your child. There for this research is useless and should be seen as child molestation.
Answer by Proud mama of 3 boys
definitely sounds like molestation anyone did that type of “research” on my son they would be dead.
What do you think? Answer below!
_______________________
！！ Lights for youth
Wonderful infant studies:
Image by jaci XIII
created for DUC challenge 363
texture by JoesSistah…
background by Sterling Silverr
original photo by Grayman ! Studying
tribute to Jean Baptiste Greuze
___________________
No Comments to “infant studies|Is male infant circumcision an appropriate gender studies question?”