infant feeding guide|Why do capitalists say Mao damaged China?
These are useful by me!,This blog is about and healthy food for children.
Here you can choose to skip this, because not is infant feeding guide,but classicA bad beginning makes a bad ending. A friend is easier lost than found. Birth is much, but breeding is more..Doing is better than saying.。!!Health tips :Make a baby-safe room and let your child practice crawling or toddling away from you and then back again. Send the message that you’ll always be around, even if you aren’t immediately to hand
Q&A–: Why do capitalists say Mao damaged China?
China’s industrial economy under Mao grew impressively–at an average rate of 10 percent per year, even during the Cultural Revolution. China, the former “sick man of Asia,” transformed itself into a major industrial power in the quarter century between 1949 and 1976–a rate of development comparable only to the greatest surges of growth in history. And it achieved this without relying on exploitation or foreign assistance, and in the face of a hostile international environment. Agriculture grew by some 3 percent a year, slightly exceeding population growth. By 1970, the problem of adequately feeding China’s population had been solved. This was accomplished through integrated economic planning, a system of collective agriculture that promoted grass-roots mobilization, flood control, steady investment in rural infrastructure, and the equitable distribution of food to peasants and rationing of essential foods so that all people were guaranteed their minimal requirements. This was a radical break with China’s past in which floods, droughts, and feudal oppression caused routine mass starvation–a condition common today in many Third World countries. And keep in mind that the amount of arable (farmable) land in China is only 70 percent of that in the U.S.– but had to provide for four times as many people.China under Mao accomplished what the U.S. has never done. It established a system of universal health care. Health services were provided free or at low cost, and the health system was guided by the principles of cooperation and egalitarianism. Maoist China integrated Western and traditional medicine. Some 1.3 million peasants were trained as health care providers (”barefoot doctors”) to meet basic health needs in the countryside. China’s socialist revolution of 1949-76 resulted in a vast improvement in life for the Chinese people. Between 1949 and 1975, life expectancy in socialist China more than doubled, from about 32 to 65 years. By the early 1970s, infant mortality rates in Shanghai were lower than in New York city.
Additionally, the cultural revolution introduced a law allowing women the right to divorce.
LibNemises- Mao did not starve 20 million people.
Mao killed counter revolutionaries who wanted to damage china.
The answer in the following: (Hint: For answers, no site audit.)
Answer by Lib Nemesis
“By 1970, the problem of adequately feeding China’s population had been solved”
Lol, I’d hope so, after 20-30 million starved under you
EDIT: Of course he did
Answer by Abdullah the Rula
Did he found the Mao Clinic?
Answer by Seethens
It has grown better since the economic experiments of the 1980’s that brought the policies of Hong Kong into the mainland.
As far as the cultural revolution goes …. my wife is from China….. and was there then….
She remembers her father being beaten, and everyone in her city being very hungry for a long long time…..
And Mao’s murderers killed many many people, as Stalin did.
Mao sucked.
Deal with it.
Answer by jaker
The fact that millions of people were killed did wonders for the economy.
Answer by §§pecial Unicorn™
Most of what people talk about is NOT the economy under him–he was a murderous dictator. If you admire him, head that way.
Answer by Nike
Capitalists don’t aspire to feed everyone nor should they. Capitalists have higher expecations.
Answer by Shawn
I did some research and it is estimated that mao was responsible for an estimated 50 to 70 million deaths. Communism sucks.
Answer by Mike C
Mao starved way more than 20 million people under his Great Leap Forward (and 15 leaps back).
Plus he left a legacy of violent oppression, most notably depicted in the Tiananmen Square incident.
Answer by Mark T
Actually he did – according to the reconning of the PRC itself , the “Great Leap Forward / Great Chinese Famine” killed at leat that many – nttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chinese_Famine
The of course there is the one child policy – which has effectively eliminated (again according to the PRC itself) – upwards of 250 MILLION Chinese who would have otherwise been born. – nttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_child_policy
You can choose to believe anything you want, but – facts do have a way of coming to light.
Alot of people – particularly in the west, are very much of the opinion that Chancellor Adolph Hitler was the worst leader from the perspective of most dead on account of their leadership. Others would suggest (rightly) that First General Secretary Josef Stalin was a more grievous mass murderer, but in fact it’s quite likely that the deaths of both Hitler and Stalin COMBINED would not equal the number of people brought to grief under Mao’s Communist China.
Answer by Matt P
Yes, I agree he did acomplish all of those things.
However, he did so at the expense of millions of Chinese lives.
He did accomplish a lot, however the price tag was too high.
Nice attempt at revisionist history. Swing and a miss.
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
infant feeding guide
The following not about infant feeding guide,But funnyA bird in the hand is worth than two in the bush.You can take a horse to the water but you cannot make him drink. Quit don’t quit. Noodles don’t noodles..Don’t claim to know what you don’t know.。!!Advice :The baby couture might be better replaced with convenient one-piece suits in practical white terry cloth.
Q&A–: Question about a certain job at hospitals?
I remember being told by some girl, when I asked what she would be doing with her major, and she said she’d be working at hospitals around newborn infants. She claimed he’d help new parents get accustomed to changing the babies, holding them, feeding and preparing them for when the baby was at home and without her to guide them. She wasn’t a nursing major, and she’d called her job something but I’m not sure what it was. Is there a specific job title for this or did she just make up some mumbo jumbo?
The answer in the following: (Hint: For answers, no site audit.)
Answer by Jill
I don’t know where you live, but in the US that is the responsibility of Registered Nurses. Sometimes Nursing Assistants or Licensed Practical Nurses can perform some of these tasks, but not all (especially the educational aspects of teaching discharge information).
What do you think? Answer below!
_______________________
___________________
It honestly is because of propaganda; most Americans think of propaganda as something done by every government but their own, but the truth is that the picture painted of China is an enormously distorted one.
The very fact of the unfairness of comparing China during those years with other industrialized nations, particularly the United States, is lost on the general populace. Also, the often-quoted famines attributed to the Mao policies politely ignores the commonplace nature of famines in China until very recent times. The corruption of previous governments, particularly the Chiang Kai-Shek regime, is glossed over, along with the damage and bloodletting the population endured.
In fact, China came into its own under Mao, and the apologists among even the Chinese themselves, certainly in the Deng years until present, do not give enough credit for the positive accomplishments. Jiang Qing, in particular, has been cast as a lightning rod for every negative aspect of post-1949 Chinese life, and this is less than fair to her legacy. Yes, the Cultural Revolution was an incredible upheaval for China, but many nations experienced a great social upheaval during the 60s, if in more moderate fashion. There are even positive accomplishments that the Cultural Revolution brought about, but don’t expect the basically-capitalist government of the China of today to admit it.
In essence, history gets to be interpreted after the fact, and it is the voice speaking loudest at the moment that gets to be heard.
Dude, your a forkin COMMIE. Your making apologies and attempting logical reasoning for a MASS MURDER. I suggest you get the fork out of the US and buy a one way ticket back to the motherland or whatever the Chinese Reds like to call it, live under their thumb for awhile (you will be under surveillance), and then, after ten years of living in the glorious people’s utopia, come back and report your wonderful findings. No Hong Kong either, real Commie China. Oh yeah, and if your offended, I give a rats ass. Communism is dead.
Then only way China’s economy is growing for the First time , is their converting their economy to a more Capitalism system, Mao was a disaster for China, as shown in the link below
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/09/30/china.60years.preview/
I personally see no difference between Mao and Hitler*********************************************************************